作者的职责
原创性和抄袭： 作者应确保他们需要撰写完全原创的作品，如果作者使用了他人的作品和/或文字，则应适当引用或引用。此类引文和引文应列在文章顶部的参考文献中。
多种出版物： 作者通常不应在一份期刊或主要出版物之外发表主要描述持续分析的手稿。同时向多个期刊提交持续稿件构成不道德的企业行为，是不可接受的。
Acknowledgement of Sources: correct acknowledgment of the work of others should incline. Authors ought to cite publications that are potent in determinative the character of the rumoured work.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship ought to be restricted to people who have created a major contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study, and will be listed as co-authors. Others, WHO have participated in sure substantive aspects of the scientific research, ought to be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
Corresponding Author: Corresponding author is that the author answerable for human activity with the journal for publication. The corresponding author ought to make sure that all applicable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are enclosed on the paper. All co-authors have seen and approved the ultimate version of the paper and have united to its submission for publication.
Acknowledgment of Funding Sources: Sources of funding for the analysis rumoured within the article ought to be punctually acknowledged at the top of the article.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors ought to disclose in their manuscript any monetary or alternative substantive conflict of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
Fundamental Errors in printed Works: Once AN author discovers a major error or quality in his/her own printed work, it's the author’s obligation to promptly inform the journal editors or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution of critique: critique assists the editors in creating editorial choices whereas editorial communications with the author can also assist the author in raising the paper.
Unqualified to Review or Promptness: Any reviewer WHO feels unqualified to review the allotted manuscript or unable to supply a prompt review ought to inform the editors and excuse him/her from the review method.
Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. they need to not be shown to, or mentioned with, others except as licensed by the chief editors. Privileged data or ideas obtained through critique should be unbroken confidential and not used for private advantage.
Standards of sound judgment: Reviews ought to be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers ought to categorical their views clearly with supporting arguments.
来源确认： 审稿人应确定作者未引用的相关印刷作品。其他地方报道过的任何先行陈述都应位于相关引文的中间。审稿人应共同决定，以引起主编的注意，考虑到的稿件与他们需要个人信息的其他印刷论文之间存在任何实质性相似或重叠。
利益冲突： 审稿人应该拒绝审稿，因为审稿人需要与任何作者存在竞争、合作或替代关系或联系而产生利益冲突。
编辑的职责
文章发表的决定： Revues 的编辑负责决定提交给期刊的文章应该被印刷。编辑们还可以遵循期刊编辑委员会的政策，遵守有关诽谤、侵权和抄袭的法律要求。编辑可能会在创建此电话会议时与审稿人核实。即使在同行评审是积极的情况下，编辑也可能会拒绝发表论文或向作者提供有关修改文章的额外意见。如果最终版本不能赢得编辑的青睐，其出版就应该被拒绝。有关出版的最终决定权在于编辑。
公平竞争： 手稿应完全根据其智力效益进行评估。
保密：编辑和任何编辑人员不得向通讯作者、审稿人、潜在审稿人、其他编辑顾问和出版商以外的任何人透露所提交稿件的任何信息。
披露和利益冲突： 在未获得作者明确书面同意的情况下，任何读过该手稿并在自己的分析中处理该手稿的人都不应使用在提交的手稿中披露的未发表的材料。
